기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Why bitcoin exchanges keep getting hacked — and how to protect yourself


The price of bitcoin took a tumble early Wednesday after a major South Korea-based cryptocurrency exchange, Bithumb, admitted hackers made off with more than $31 million worth of virtual currency. The incident is the latest in a long string of thefts at the online portals where investors trade cash for digital coins such as bitcoin and ether. Bithumb has not said how the attack occurred.
What makes exchanges vulnerable to these sorts of attacks in the first place?
For starters, cryptocurrency experts blame lax security at the hacked exchanges, as well as the booming popularity of digital currencies more generally.
"Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have risen dramatically in popularity and value over the past few years," said John Sedunov, an assistant professor of finance at Villanova University. "This fast run-up may have caught some exchanges off-guard, and they may not have had the capital on hand, time, or even the technical ability to ramp up security features fast enough to ward off potential attackers."

In other words, hackers love going after exchanges because they are a rewarding and often easy targets. In this respect, exchanges are little different from health-care providers with lucrative medical data, or credit reporting bureaus that hold Social Security numbers.
Unlike those types of institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges are purpose-built to move actual assets from one person to another. And that can raise additional risks. Here is how and what you can do to shield yourself.
Begin by considering your personal financial situation. If you are like many people, you have both a checking account to cover daily transactions and a savings account or safe-deposit box where you keep money you know you will not be spending anytime soon.
A lot of cryptocurrency exchanges work the same way. They run what is called a "hot" wallet that is connected to the Internet, where they store the virtual currency they know they will use to quickly fulfill their customers' trades. Meanwhile, they might keep some — or even the bulk — of their customers' funds in a "cold" wallet. This cold storage is disconnected from the Internet and inaccessible to customers, partly to ensure it is off limits to remote hackers.
While many exchanges have adopted techniques to protect their hot wallets, such as obtaining insurance on the funds inside or requiring multiple secret keys for access, it is impossible to eliminate the risk of a hack completely. Just as online criminals are constantly developing new forms of malware that exploit bugs in software its developers have not caught, hot wallets are vulnerable to the same kinds of risk.
That does not mean hot wallets are inherently bad. Imagine if every time you paid a bill at a restaurant or bar, you had to visit your savings account to physically pull out the money. It would be a massive inconvenience, and settling your tab would take ages. Hot wallets speed things up, at the cost of some built-in security risks.
For these reasons, many cryptocurrency investors recommend storing your coins not in a wallet that is controlled by an exchange, but rather in a cold wallet you control. This wallet could be a hard drive you have unplugged from a computer, a USB drive you store in a drawer in your house or even codes written on a piece of paper. When you want to sell the coins in the wallet, just reconnect the wallet to the Internet.
This approach is not without headaches, too, but it is still a better option. On Reddit, stories abound of investors who have misplaced their cold wallets or the access codes needed to open them. In these sorts of cases, your money may as well have been lost to hackers. Other investors on Reddit still say trusting yourself is preferable to trusting exchanges.

"It's frustrating to see people lose money to this consistent mistake," wrote user PM_ME_YOUR_NANO on a recent thread. "No one should be losing even 10% of their available coins because an exchange is bad. Cryptocurrency is about being trustless. Exchanges are trusted systems without great regulation."

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

BLACK LABEL, a leader in physical security in the IoT world

Mutual Verification System 상호검증시스템 블랙라벨의 보안 솔루션은 상호검증시스템으로 SIM 과 신원인증서버 간의 상호검증을 통한 개인식별 보안솔루션이다 . 현존하는 무선통신망 중 개인식별장치인 USIM 을 사용한 이동통신망이 가장 해킹에 안전한 것으로 되어 있다 . 왜냐하면 USIM 카드에 사용자의 이동통신 번호를 비롯해 개인식별코드가 입력되어 있어 인증 후 전화나 메시지를 송수신하기 때문이다 . BLACK LABEL 은 SIM 의 특성을 활용하고 개인식별과정의 단점을 보강하여 개인식별 보안을 고도화시켜서 “ 상호검증시스템 ” 이라는 보안 솔루션을 개발하였다 . 공개키   암호화   모듈인  RSA 와   독자   개발한   가변코드   알고리즘을   결합   전문의   내용과   형태가   매번   변경되어   기존   전문을   사용할   수   없으며   통신   전문   탈취   시   분석   및   복호화   불가 IoT  환경에   구성   된   통신   대상을   상호   검증하여   대상의   변조로   인한   정보   유출을   원천적으로   차단하므로   보안이   취약한   네트워크에서도   안전 상호검증시스템은 SIM 의 MCU 를 통해 최초 개인식별코드를 패턴없이 무한변경하여 인증서버와 개인식별정보를 송수신하는 시스템이다 . 기존의 ...

BLACK LABEL Secured Automobile Smart Key Solution

Developed by MERCEDES BENZ for the first time 20 years ago, the SmartKey has been very convenient for motorists. However, since this technology has been applied so far, the smart key security has not been upgraded so that even if a simple wireless hacking device is purchased on the market, the password which is exchanged between the car and the smart key is wirelessly captured, the car door is opened, Things are happening in a random way. The biggest problem in smart key security so far is that the identification code exchanged between the smart key and the key is a fixed value and the security is difficult to hack the fixed single code value. However, if a mutual verification system, which is a security solution of BLACK LABEL, is applied to a smart key and a vehicle, it is impossible to access the vehicle even if the identification code value is fixed in a single code, Can be made. This is because the code that has been changed once and then discarded is discarded. ...

Six Tools Used by Hackers to Steal Cryptocurrency: How to Protect Wallets

In the early July, it was  reported  that Bleeping Computer detected suspicious activity targeted at defrauding 2.3 million Bitcoin wallets, which they found to be under threat of being hacked. The attackers used malware — known as “clipboard hijackers” — which operates in the clipboard and can potentially replace the copied wallet address with one of the attackers. The threat of hacking attacks of this type has been  predicted  by Kaspersky Lab as early as November of last year, and they did not take long to become reality. For the time being, this is one of the most widespread types of attacks that is aimed at stealing users’ information or money, with the overall estimated share of attacks to individual accounts and wallets being about 20 percent of the total number of malware attacks. And there’s more. On July 12, Cointelegraph  published  Kaspersky Lab’s report, which stated that criminals were able to steal more than $9 million in  Ethere...