기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Robot chefs can handle more than pizzas and burgers



Creator, a new hamburger joint in San Francisco, claims to deliver a burger worth $US18 ($24) for $US6 — in other words, to provide the quality of posh restaurants at a fast-food price. The substance behind this claim is that its chef de cuisine is a robot.
Creator’s bot automates the whole process of preparing a bur­ger. And it is not alone. Other robot chefs that can prepare entire meals are working, or soon will be, in kitchens in other parts of the US, as well as in China and Britain.
Creator’s burger bot is a trolley-sized unit that has a footprint of 2sq m. Customers send it their orders via a tablet. They are able to customise everything from how well-done the burger will be to the type of cheese and toppings they want. The robot grinds the meat, forms the patties, griddles them, chops tomatoes and grates cheese, slices, toasts and butters the bun, and dispenses seasoning and sauces. It then assembles and bags the finished product.
Listed like that, the process sounds rather quotidian. In fact, it took eight years to perfect. As far back as 2012, a mere two years into the project, the machine was described as “95 per cent reliable”, but that is not enough for a busy kitchen. Chopping tomatoes was a particularly tough challenge, but even details such as the paddle that packs the burger into a bag without squashing it were tricky to master. Only now, with a machine they claim can turn out, reliably, 120 burgers an hour, did Alex Vardakostas, the engineer behind the project, and his co-founders feel confident enough to open a restaurant.
What works for one sort of fast food can work for others. Though the business of pizza-making has not yet been robotised completely, Zume Pizza, also based in California, is getting close. It has a team of “doughbots” that speed up stretching the dough from 45 seconds to just nine. The toppings still have to be made the conventional way, but the firm has robotised the dispensing and spreading of them, and also the moving of topped pizzas into and out of ovens.
In Boston, a restaurant called Spyce offers more fashionable robot-created fare. Customers order from a touchscreen menu and can watch the robot measure, mix and cook dishes ranging from “Latin” (black beans and roasted chicken with chilli and avocado on brown rice) to “Hearth” (balsamic-glazed sprouts and sweet potato with kale on quinoa) in an inductively heated wok. Woks stand in a row beneath a conveyor belt, which automatically delivers the correct ingredients to each. They are then mixed and cooked before a human server adds toppings. Spyce’s bot can prepare dishes in three minutes.
In China, Li Zhiming has developed a robot that can cook any of 40 recipes from Hunan province. Much of Hunan’s cuisine involves heating food rapidly in oil, a process that is difficult to mechanise because of the number of different ingredients that have to be cooked just so. Li’s robots work by dispensing precise quantities of each ingredient from a series of hoppers in sequence, then stirring them in a wok over a gas flame at an exact temperature for a specific time. When a meal is complete, the robot serves it into a bowl, then cleans out the cooking pot.



A hamburger is assembled by the Creator machine.
Li opened his first robot-­catered restaurant in May, in Changsha, Hunan’s capital. Its kitchen is staffed by three bots and two humans. Normally, he says, a restaurant of this size, offering that sort of variety, would have a kitchen staff of eight
For fast-food restaurants, in which the cooking is something akin to an assembly line, robotic kitchens with limited repertoires look like a promising innovation. For real foodies, though, a robot that can turn its hand to almost anything culinary would be the acme of automation. And Moley Robotics, a British firm, aspires to do just that. Its robot chef is intended to emulate a real one.
This project is a more complicated proposition than an assembly-line robot and is, it must be said, behind schedule. They say it will be available this year.
It features a pair of arms with human-like hands. These manipulate ingredients, utensils and heat sources in a well-equipped kitchen. The robot draws on a databank of recipes that are records of the actions of a human master chef collected by a motion-capture system. A robot such as this could therefore cook thousands of recipes on demand.
Moley’s target appears to be the luxury domestic market rather than the restaurant trade. If it is successful in the houses of the rich, though, sous-chefs may get nervous.
The catering industry is known for low pay, so automation is not an obvious cost-saver. It is probably, however, a quality and reliability enhancer, and in a field with fickle customers, and competitors around every corner, that could count for a lot.






댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

지문 넘어 정맥·홍채로...4000억원 '생체인증' 선점경쟁

4000억원 규모 국내 생체인증 시장을 선점하기 위해 관련 업체 경쟁이 치열하다. 생체인증시스템이 현금자동입출금기( ATM )부터 공항 신분확인, 기업 출입관리까지 다양한 분야로 확대된다. 지문인증을 넘어 손바닥, 손가락 정맥(장정맥, 지정맥)과 안면, 홍채 등 다양한 신체 부위를 활용한 인증 솔루션이 각광 받는다. 25일 업계에 따르면  Sh 수협은행은 장정맥 기반 금융서비스를  ATM 에 먼저 적용한다. 자체 기기에 도입하는 데 그치지 않고, 장정맥 인증 확산을 위해 타행· GS 리테일과 제휴도 추진한다.  GS 25 편의점 내  ATM 에서 장정맥 인증으로 입·출금, 계좌이체 등이 가능해진다. 신협중앙회는 손가락 정맥패턴을 이용한 '지정맥' 인증 시스템을 고객 간편결제 서비스에 도입하는 방안을 검토한다. 지난해 시스템 통제와 임직원 확인용 지정맥 인증을 사내 도입했다. 생체인증은 금융권 중심으로  ATM 과 개인금고, 공항, 기업 출입 등 다양한 곳에 활용된다. 한국후지쯔는 신한은행 시작으로 국민은행, 우리은행,  NH 증권, 롯데카드, 케이뱅크 등에 장정맥 인증 서비스 '팜시큐어'를 공급했다. 제주·김포공항에 장정맥을 이용한 실명확인 시스템을 구축했다. 동서석유화학,  SK 텔링크 등 일반 기업도 도입했다. LG 히다찌는 지정맥 인증 서비스를 신협중앙회 사내통제시스템뿐 아니라  BNK 부산은행 스마트  ATM 에도 공급했다. 부산은행은  ATM 뿐 아니라 은행창구 등에도 지정맥을 활용한다.  LG 히다찌는 신한카드, 나이스정보통신 등과 업무협약을 맺고 오프라인 간편결제로 지정맥 활용 준비 작업에 나섰다. 계명대 동산의료원과도 업무협약을 맺고 병원 인증시스템 도입도 검토한다. 국내 스타트업 위닝아이는 카메라를 이용한 손바닥 인증 기술을 전북은행 '뉴스마트뱅킹', 한화손해보험 '스마트인슈', 신영증권 등에 공급했다. 현대모비스와 손잡고 차량용 인증 기술 개...

Cold Wallet Vs. Hot Wallet: What’s The Difference?

You may have heard about cold and hot digital wallets but do you know how they are different from each other? The simplest way to describe the difference between a cold wallet and a hot one is this: hot wallets are connected to the internet while cold wallets are not. Most people who hold digital assets have both cold and hot wallets because they are designed for different purposes. Hot wallets are like checking accounts while cold wallets are similar to savings accounts. People who have digital assets keep a small amount of money in their hot wallets for purchasing stuff. They keep the vast majority of their digital coins in their cold wallet. If you like Medium articles in video form, you’re in luck: SECURITY Q: Why do people keep most of their digital coins in a cold wallet? A: Hackers cannot steal digital assets that are not connected to the internet. Q: So then, how safe are hot wallets? A: The security of hot wallets is dependent upon the security ha...

Avoiding Cryptocurrency Scams

The Money Makers Club now has 6 of 15 available seats. Learn more here! Everyone is always focused on the potential upside of buying cryptocurrency, but they forget there are always going to be hidden downsides as well. The downside risk of investing in cryptocurrencies is huge. Not only do you need to worry about the high volatility of these assets, but you also need to bear in mind that theft is always a possibility, and the assets are poorly regulated.  Lack of Regulation Creates Opportunity for Thieves In the equity and debt markets, there are stringent controls on the way capital is invested and the rules that govern investors. The goal is to protect investors from any fraud or wrongdoing, and even though there are times where it takes regulators longer than normal to catch on (see: Bernie Madoff), the general effect is a safer investment marketplace.  Fraud can occur in a variety of ways. It can be the result of false claims by the company regarding the s...