기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

How to protect your business from endpoint attacks


More endpoints and harder-to-manage endpoints add up to challenges for IT security
Too many businesses approach security by countering yesterday’s threats today. True, the network, the server and the data centre will always be targets for attack, but hackers have learnt that there are better ways to get to them than the direct approach – ways that make use of more vulnerable points of entry. And while many organisations continue to focus their defences on the perimeter, cyber-criminals increasingly look to bypass it entirely, attacking endpoint devices and then using them as an entry point to spread across the network.
Some of these attacks focus on well-established, well-protected targets, particularly business-owned laptops and desktop PCs. However, the most dangerous are aimed at devices that many businesses might not even consider to be a target, and where there isn’t the same level of protection. In the words of G.W. Davidson in a recent SANS Institute White Paper, ‘Even as the network becomes more complex and varied, security and IT professionals have recognized that widely used devices, such as printers, physical security systems, HVAC [heating, ventilation and air conditioning] control systems and point-of-sale devices, represent vulnerable potential attack surfaces.’ In the war between business and cyber-criminal gangs, these devices are the new frontline.
Endpoints under threat

There’s no doubt that IoT devices can pose real opportunities for businesses, helping them improve their processes and reduce operating costs, but they also open up new vulnerabilities for hackers to exploit. In March 2018 Symantec noted that attacks on IoT devices had increased by 600% between 2016 and 2017. Many such attacks have targeted consumer devices, including webcams, home routers, digital video recorders and baby monitors, but as use of IoT devices spreads into business, more and more companies could be affected. A recent report by the Ponemon Institute suggests that while the number of IoT devices in the workplace is increasing significantly, practices for securing and managing those devices aren’t maturing at the same rate. In fact, 56% of those surveyed didn’t even keep an inventory, mostly due to a lack of centralised control.
And IoT devices aren’t the only vulnerable endpoints that companies routinely ignore. As Davidson explains in the SANS Institute White Paper, ‘in the 2016 report, a common networked device – the printer – was the least likely to be covered under an organization’s security management program, and the results did not change significantly in the 2017 report. Considering the ubiquity of printers, this can represent a large vulnerability for an organization and deserves attention.’
The growth of BYOD devices in the workplace is another cause for concern. A May 2018 study by the SME card payment services company, Paymentsense, found that companies that introduced a BYOD policy were more likely to have experienced a security incident since introduction, and that the likelihood increased with the size of the company, from just 14% in businesses with 1-10 employees to 70% for businesses with 11 to 50 workers and 94% for businesses with 100 to 250 staff. The 2018 Cyber Security Breaches Survey from the UK government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport came to similar conclusions. Left improperly or totally unmanaged, user-owned laptops, tablets and smartphones are giving hackers a new way inside.
The issue with all these endpoints isn’t just that they give cyber-criminals access to the information held within, but a secret gateway into the company network they can use for additional attacks. As another SANS Institute report, Endpoint Protection Response: A SANS survey, puts it, in a discussion of the most frequently compromised endpoints, ‘in most cases more than one endpoint is involved, indicating that once an attacker gains a foothold, compromise of other assets is likely to follow due to lateral movement.’
The problem with the old approach
This ties into a wider problem: that many of the existing security provisions are no longer effective. A bigger, stronger wall at the perimeter will no longer fend off attacks that target the endpoints themselves and then move laterally. In fact, phishing attacks and other forms of targeted attacks are designed to do exactly this. Anti-virus products, meanwhile, are struggling to keep up with the rapid development of malware, not to mention the growth of fileless attacks; malware that resides in memory without ever appearing on a drive.
The SANS survey explains that only 47% of the attacks detailed by respondents were detected through anti-virus, with 32% detected through automated SIEM alerts and network analysis, and another 26% detected through EDR (endpoint detection and response) platforms. For too many companies, the time between spotting an attack and remediation is still measured in hours or even days and ‘with infections spreading across endpoints in minutes, this is a lengthy window for attackers.’
Solving the endpoint equation
What can organisations do? Part of the answer lies in developing and making effective use of automated EDR platforms and attack behaviour modelling, using AI and Machine Learning to accelerate detection and remediation. Companies need both the budget to procure new security technology and the resources to implement them, but this is a long-term play. Businesses need solutions right now.
Simple, practical measures would include a stronger upgrade and patching policy that addresses the full range of devices, including IoT devices and printers. Here robust printer management and security tools, like HP JetAdmin and HP JetAdvantage Security Manager can help, enabling companies to establish a single security policy and apply it across the entire printer fleet.
Training is another effective option. The more informed workers are about malicious apps, malicious websites, phishing and other risks, the less chance there is of attacks creeping through. In fact, workers trained to spot and report strange device behaviour can provide crucial early warning signs. End-users may need help to secure their BYOD devices, and information on why they shouldn’t disable security on business devices, even when it seems an inconvenience. But with the right training and policies in place, you can turn end-users from a major vulnerability into the first line of defence.
Most importantly, though, companies can choose and purchase devices where security comes built-in. These devices are designed to be resilient, so that attacks are shrugged off and those responsible denied their foothold. For example, HP PCs and printers incorporate SureStart technologies, that ensure the device’s BIOS hasn’t been tampered with by malware, and enable it to self-heal if a compromise is detected. They also have intrusion detection, to monitor the device and warn of any attacks, plus built-in encryption to protect any data at rest on the device. HP PCs also add secure browsing technology, SureClick, designed to prevent workers from clicking on a link in an email and being sent to a malicious website or downloading malicious software. Meanwhile, hardened, multi-factor authentication makes it substantially more difficult for hackers to steal credentials and take over endpoints that way.
A more secure PC and printer fleet won’t fix vulnerabilities affecting IoT devices or applications, but it gives IT teams more time and space to monitor, manage and update these more vulnerable endpoints. In today’s hostile threat landscape, they need all the help they can get.

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

지문 넘어 정맥·홍채로...4000억원 '생체인증' 선점경쟁

4000억원 규모 국내 생체인증 시장을 선점하기 위해 관련 업체 경쟁이 치열하다. 생체인증시스템이 현금자동입출금기( ATM )부터 공항 신분확인, 기업 출입관리까지 다양한 분야로 확대된다. 지문인증을 넘어 손바닥, 손가락 정맥(장정맥, 지정맥)과 안면, 홍채 등 다양한 신체 부위를 활용한 인증 솔루션이 각광 받는다. 25일 업계에 따르면  Sh 수협은행은 장정맥 기반 금융서비스를  ATM 에 먼저 적용한다. 자체 기기에 도입하는 데 그치지 않고, 장정맥 인증 확산을 위해 타행· GS 리테일과 제휴도 추진한다.  GS 25 편의점 내  ATM 에서 장정맥 인증으로 입·출금, 계좌이체 등이 가능해진다. 신협중앙회는 손가락 정맥패턴을 이용한 '지정맥' 인증 시스템을 고객 간편결제 서비스에 도입하는 방안을 검토한다. 지난해 시스템 통제와 임직원 확인용 지정맥 인증을 사내 도입했다. 생체인증은 금융권 중심으로  ATM 과 개인금고, 공항, 기업 출입 등 다양한 곳에 활용된다. 한국후지쯔는 신한은행 시작으로 국민은행, 우리은행,  NH 증권, 롯데카드, 케이뱅크 등에 장정맥 인증 서비스 '팜시큐어'를 공급했다. 제주·김포공항에 장정맥을 이용한 실명확인 시스템을 구축했다. 동서석유화학,  SK 텔링크 등 일반 기업도 도입했다. LG 히다찌는 지정맥 인증 서비스를 신협중앙회 사내통제시스템뿐 아니라  BNK 부산은행 스마트  ATM 에도 공급했다. 부산은행은  ATM 뿐 아니라 은행창구 등에도 지정맥을 활용한다.  LG 히다찌는 신한카드, 나이스정보통신 등과 업무협약을 맺고 오프라인 간편결제로 지정맥 활용 준비 작업에 나섰다. 계명대 동산의료원과도 업무협약을 맺고 병원 인증시스템 도입도 검토한다. 국내 스타트업 위닝아이는 카메라를 이용한 손바닥 인증 기술을 전북은행 '뉴스마트뱅킹', 한화손해보험 '스마트인슈', 신영증권 등에 공급했다. 현대모비스와 손잡고 차량용 인증 기술 개...

BLACK LABEL, An IoT Security and Platform Company, Signed An MOU of Developing Security Solution for WDF Cryptocurrency

On June 21, 2018, Black Label Gangnam signed an MOU for the development of an integrated security solution for electronic wallets, servers and shopping malls to be issued by (re) the WDF cryptocurrency by the World Distribution Federation.  (re) The World Trade Federation, under the umbrella of the United Nations, is building a global distribution platform with more than 80 member countries around the world. On this platform, we are developing cryptography for the payment of funds for distribution and for the payment of shopping malls, and have developed this security solution in conjunction with the black label and signed a working agreement for integration. We are going to issue an IC card with the black label's patented pattern-free personal identification code (RSA +, BLACK LABEL's Patent Technology) and apply it to individuals ' electronic wallets, company servers, and shopping mall payment security.  The biggest problem with cryptography is the physical security of...

BLACK LABEL IoT SECURITY SOLUTION, MUTUAL VERIFICATION SYSTEM

Black Label's security solution is a mutual verification system, which is a personal identification security solution through mutual verification between SIM and identity authentication server. Among existing wireless communication networks, a mobile communication network using a USIM, which is a personal identification device, is considered to be most secure against hacking. This is because the USIM card has a personal identification code, including the user's mobile communication number, so it sends and receives a telephone call or message after authentication. BLACK LABEL has developed a security solution called "Mutual Verification System" by utilizing the characteristics of SIM and enhancing the disadvantages of the personal identification process to enhance the personal identification security. The mutual verification system is a system that sends and receives personally identifiable information to the authentication server by infinitely changing the i...