기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Avoiding Cryptocurrency Scams



Everyone is always focused on the potential upside of buying cryptocurrency, but they forget there are always going to be hidden downsides as well. The downside risk of investing in cryptocurrencies is huge. Not only do you need to worry about the high volatility of these assets, but you also need to bear in mind that theft is always a possibility, and the assets are poorly regulated. 

Lack of Regulation Creates Opportunity for Thieves

In the equity and debt markets, there are stringent controls on the way capital is invested and the rules that govern investors. The goal is to protect investors from any fraud or wrongdoing, and even though there are times where it takes regulators longer than normal to catch on (see: Bernie Madoff), the general effect is a safer investment marketplace. 
Fraud can occur in a variety of ways. It can be the result of false claims by the company regarding the state of their finances, the returns they have yielded, or how their funds are being managed. Any one of these routes causes a potential investor to get the wrong idea of the expected outcome of an investment in that company, and the result is a case of fraud. 
Many have been espousing how great it is that there are no regulations on investments in ICOs or cryptocurrencies, with most of them being “self-regulated”. This is only a good thing as long as it is executed correctly. 

Examples of Fraud in the Industry

One recent example is with the cryptocurrency “One Coin”. By employing marketing tactics similar to a multi-level marketing scheme, and not having a proper product to show for all the money invested in the project, executives were able to take advantage of numerous investors. 
Ponzi schemes are business practices where the reported investment results are fuelled by the funds from new entrants to the investment vehicle rather than legitimate profits. The financing practices depends on passing on money from recent investors to older investors. The business practices of One Coin very much fit this model. 
The two top things investors should be looking at that will help them avoid being defrauded in this unregulated market are the team running the project, and the product they have created. In the case of One Coin, you have a team that could be considered risky, at the very best. The CEO, Ruja Ignatova, seems to have a past filled with lies (or at least unverified claims). Sebastian Greenwood is another executive involved who has also ran several multi-level marketing schemes in the past. 
In terms of product, there are cases where developers have been able to get funding after writing a short white paper explaining their business plan. In Silicon Valley, everyone knows that ideas are cheap, and execution is everything, but the crypto-world is forgetting this and putting money into anything that moves. In the end, One Coin was branded a Ponzi scheme and got shut down, but not before many investors lost their money. 
Another example is with BitConnect, where users were promised massive returns if they lend their funds out through the protocol. This also turned out to be a Ponzi scheme, and was eventually shut down by American regulators filing a cease and desist order. 

Investors Beware

A common thread here is the centralized management of funds. When this is combined with the sort of “investors beware” market we are in right now, there are all too many opportunities for fraud to occur. 
The key is determining the differences between risky investment and fraudulent investment. Regulators are slowly coming to terms with the fact that ICOs are here to stay, and are moving to define whether they are a security or not, as well as how they will be regulated in the future. 
There are going to be many more One Coins in the cryptocurrency community, and as always, the best thing you can do to prevent yourself from being victimized is do your own research and only invest as much as you can afford to lose.

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

지문 넘어 정맥·홍채로...4000억원 '생체인증' 선점경쟁

4000억원 규모 국내 생체인증 시장을 선점하기 위해 관련 업체 경쟁이 치열하다. 생체인증시스템이 현금자동입출금기( ATM )부터 공항 신분확인, 기업 출입관리까지 다양한 분야로 확대된다. 지문인증을 넘어 손바닥, 손가락 정맥(장정맥, 지정맥)과 안면, 홍채 등 다양한 신체 부위를 활용한 인증 솔루션이 각광 받는다. 25일 업계에 따르면  Sh 수협은행은 장정맥 기반 금융서비스를  ATM 에 먼저 적용한다. 자체 기기에 도입하는 데 그치지 않고, 장정맥 인증 확산을 위해 타행· GS 리테일과 제휴도 추진한다.  GS 25 편의점 내  ATM 에서 장정맥 인증으로 입·출금, 계좌이체 등이 가능해진다. 신협중앙회는 손가락 정맥패턴을 이용한 '지정맥' 인증 시스템을 고객 간편결제 서비스에 도입하는 방안을 검토한다. 지난해 시스템 통제와 임직원 확인용 지정맥 인증을 사내 도입했다. 생체인증은 금융권 중심으로  ATM 과 개인금고, 공항, 기업 출입 등 다양한 곳에 활용된다. 한국후지쯔는 신한은행 시작으로 국민은행, 우리은행,  NH 증권, 롯데카드, 케이뱅크 등에 장정맥 인증 서비스 '팜시큐어'를 공급했다. 제주·김포공항에 장정맥을 이용한 실명확인 시스템을 구축했다. 동서석유화학,  SK 텔링크 등 일반 기업도 도입했다. LG 히다찌는 지정맥 인증 서비스를 신협중앙회 사내통제시스템뿐 아니라  BNK 부산은행 스마트  ATM 에도 공급했다. 부산은행은  ATM 뿐 아니라 은행창구 등에도 지정맥을 활용한다.  LG 히다찌는 신한카드, 나이스정보통신 등과 업무협약을 맺고 오프라인 간편결제로 지정맥 활용 준비 작업에 나섰다. 계명대 동산의료원과도 업무협약을 맺고 병원 인증시스템 도입도 검토한다. 국내 스타트업 위닝아이는 카메라를 이용한 손바닥 인증 기술을 전북은행 '뉴스마트뱅킹', 한화손해보험 '스마트인슈', 신영증권 등에 공급했다. 현대모비스와 손잡고 차량용 인증 기술 개...

BLACK LABEL, An IoT Security and Platform Company, Signed An MOU of Developing Security Solution for WDF Cryptocurrency

On June 21, 2018, Black Label Gangnam signed an MOU for the development of an integrated security solution for electronic wallets, servers and shopping malls to be issued by (re) the WDF cryptocurrency by the World Distribution Federation.  (re) The World Trade Federation, under the umbrella of the United Nations, is building a global distribution platform with more than 80 member countries around the world. On this platform, we are developing cryptography for the payment of funds for distribution and for the payment of shopping malls, and have developed this security solution in conjunction with the black label and signed a working agreement for integration. We are going to issue an IC card with the black label's patented pattern-free personal identification code (RSA +, BLACK LABEL's Patent Technology) and apply it to individuals ' electronic wallets, company servers, and shopping mall payment security.  The biggest problem with cryptography is the physical security of...

BLACK LABEL IoT SECURITY SOLUTION, MUTUAL VERIFICATION SYSTEM

Black Label's security solution is a mutual verification system, which is a personal identification security solution through mutual verification between SIM and identity authentication server. Among existing wireless communication networks, a mobile communication network using a USIM, which is a personal identification device, is considered to be most secure against hacking. This is because the USIM card has a personal identification code, including the user's mobile communication number, so it sends and receives a telephone call or message after authentication. BLACK LABEL has developed a security solution called "Mutual Verification System" by utilizing the characteristics of SIM and enhancing the disadvantages of the personal identification process to enhance the personal identification security. The mutual verification system is a system that sends and receives personally identifiable information to the authentication server by infinitely changing the i...